Congrats to Akron and Caleb Porter

So this weekend, I watched most of Akron’s two matches en route to the school’s first ever National Championship in any sport. I must admit, I was gob-smacked by what I saw.

With the proviso that I was too young to remember Arena’s teams at UVA, Akron was the single best college team I have ever seen – seriously. One or two of Cirovski’s Maryland teams come sort of close, but none played with the kind of unbelievably good possession-oriented soccer that Akron did this weekend.

Akron’s coach, Caleb Porter is, without question, the most promising young American soccer coach I’ve seen since I began covering soccer.

I’ve taken my shots at the Akron program and Porter before. Quite simply, I don’t think I’ve ever been more wrong about any subject at any time. Porter is the real thing, and so is Akron’s program.

Porter should, in theory, have his choice of any MLS gig that comes open in the next couple of years. If he can get a team to play like that in college soccer, where the rules practically beg coaches to have their teams run around like headless chicken, I do not doubt for one minute that he could get pros to do it even better in MLS.

Bruce Arena’s almost 60 years old and not getting any younger. Why do I think we might have just found his future successor in Los Angeles?

For more on Akron’s triumph, read Bill’s summary of Akron and where it’s come as a program.

Join the Fighting Talker NCAA Men’s Soccer Bracket Contest!

Since we all know that most, not all, but most of the actual soccer on offer during the NCAA Tournament will be unwatchable dreck, let’s liven it up with some casual gambling.

That’s right, it’s the 2010 Fighting Talker Men’s Soccer Bracket Contest. Sign up, and this time I promise, I swear, there WILL be an actual (small) prize on offer for the winner.

Here’s how to signup.

  1. Goto the NCAA’s Bracket Challenge Site
  2. Make your picks and then join the group called Fighting Talker League. The password is diablo (case sensitive).
  3. If you have any questions or problems, leave them in the comments here and I’ll try and sort them out.

The deadline to signup is 12pm on Thursday.

Thanks and good luck!

MLS and the USSF are heading in the right direction in youth development matters

DC United academy product Andy Najar, age 17, battles against Landon Donovan
Photo courtesy of Nick Eckert, more of his work available here.

In the last week or so, we’ve been lucky enough to read two great pieces on the changes in American youth development by Bill Archer and Tom Dunmore. Ever since our elimination from the World Cup by Ghana (and Jurgen Klinsmann’s subsequent comments), the manner by which American soccer develops its young talent has been at the forefront of discussion topics.

I’m glad Bill wrote what he wrote not only because I happen to agree with it but because I got a far better sense of what the ODP/State Cup system was and how it apparently related to all the other youth development schemes out there. I didn’t play competitive soccer growing up and my brother, who did, decided he didn’t need the aggravation of playing on our high school’s hyper-competitive team and ended up attending UVA to study history rather than to play on the varsity.

The only YD setup I was familiar with was the MLS-based systems that have entered existence since I’ve been writing about the sport. Thus, it was really informative to get a summary of how ODP worked and from the looks of it, it didn’t work one bit. It’s clear to me now that when people like Klinsmann moan that our system is pay-to-play, that’s the system they appear to be talking about primarily.

And that’s precisely the system that MLS academies and the USSF Development Academy System are working to solve, literally as we speak. It’s not so much that Klinsmann and the baying hoards are wrong. For the most part, they are not. It’s that there are solutions taking hold and bringing in someone with the specific mandate to blow them up and start over just doesn’t make any sense.

That said, while I agree with the sentiment that MLS is coming in and blowing away all the other YD options, I think he should’ve given a bit more credit to the other USSF Development Academy Clubs. I think they play an equally important role in two specific areas:

  1. In soccer-heavy areas outside MLS regions such as Raleigh-Durham, St. Louis, Baltimore, and the whole of Florida, the USSF Academy clubs provide a good learning environment and top competition for kids who don’t live in MLS’ 14 current US markets.
  2. In some areas, it just might not be possible for a single club or academy to find every talent. For example in SoCal, Houston, or New York, there’s more than enough room for multiple USSF Academy clubs as opposed to just one MLS team trying to cover hundreds of kids over hundreds of miles.

Now, one question I’d love to ask MLS development types is how do the MLS clubs work with the other clubs. For example, what if it was Potomac Soccer Club in nearby Rockville or McLean Youth Soccer in Virginia who found Andy Najar on that playing field? They both have their own teams in the USSF academy league. Say he lights up the Academy league, how does DC United get him on to its academy’s roster without leaving the smaller clubs pissed off? Now, maybe the smaller clubs simply understand their status compared to the MLS academies and justify it by adding Najar to their alumni page and hoping his future glory rubs off on them in some way. But if the plan right now is for all the non-MLS academy clubs to simply supply the MLS academies, I can see some fissures opening up in the, so far, seemingly well-operated USSF Academy System. I might be wrong here. I’m just curious to hear how that relationship works within the academy structure.

Moving on to Dunmore’s piece on how college soccer does or doesn’t relate to elite talent development, I am one of those who believe that college soccer, while not ideal in many ways, will continue to provide talent to MLS and the US national team. I don’t think it’s the right place for truly elite talent, but those who say that it (and the collegiate draft) should be entirely eliminated are both unrealistic and shortsighted.

If I had to pick a sport whose talent development system to call my favorite, I’d say it’s hockey. In hockey, American and Canadian players can choose between attending a US college and getting some education or playing fully professional major junior hockey starting at age 16 in the Canadian Hockey League. Both systems have their pluses and minuses but both systems regularly produce elite talent whether its college players like Zach Parise (North Dakota), Martin St. Louis (Vermont), and Ryan Miller (Michigan State) or CHL guys like Bobby Ryan, Sydney Crosby or the scores of other Canadians who’ve come through major juniors. The point is that both systems place plenty of players in the NHL and Olympics.

American soccer needs a system where both systems work. I think, with the development of an elite MLS/USSF-led development program we’re finally building the system analagous to major juniors to go alongside the collegiate game. That said, I think college hockey is a far better vehicle for talent development than college soccer (far more games + better rules), but hopefully the NCAA will move to make the kinds of changes to its soccer rules and regulations to make it a better development venue. Of course the NCAA is an infuriatingly slow-moving and political organization, but there’s evidence that’s already underway.

I think it’s irresponsible to simply say that we should send any 15-year old who believes they can play professional soccer into massive European-style fully-professional academies. I saw the recent NYT piece on Ajax and wasn’t wowed, I was terrified. I found the whole system utterly dehumanizing and even more than that, totally dechildhooding. (Apologies for totally making that word up.) I don’t want that. I don’t want soccer players chewed up and destroyed before puberty like figure skating, gymnastics and tennis.

If I had to choose between the US winning the World Cup and the US not turning soccer into a sport that damages and chews out its young, I’d choose the latter every single time. A trophy, any trophy, just isn’t worth the kind of damage that I’ve seen in so many other sports, here and abroad. That said, I don’t think that kind of binary choice has to exist in American soccer.

The key now isn’t to overreact to every disappointing “phenom” or disappointing result that rolls down the pike. If there is a next step to take, it’s to monitor the USSF academies and ensure best practices are spread across all teams in all areas, whether they emanate from MLS organizations or other clubs. Also, the USSF needs to keep pushing the NCAA to make it a better venue for developing players by trying to get D-1 teams to play more matches, practice a bit more, and get its rules closer to the FIFA standard.

Believe it or not, but I think we’re finally heading the right direction in terms of elite talent development. And whether you like it or not, it’s the much maligned USSF and MLS leading the way.

A quick defense of college soccer


This Comcast Sportsnet report from a few years back gives a sense of the atmosphere at Maryland matches.

Here we are on the eve of the 2009 College Soccer season and you’ll never believe it, but I am actually a defender of college as a method of player development for certain types of players. I agree with an awful lot of this article over at Pitch Invasion says. The point I agree the most with is one made by Maryland Coach Sasho Cirovski:
Notice how he uses the phrase “NCAA Division I top 20.” That’s key, because there is a massive difference between the top of D1 and the middle and bottom. I always stress to people that for the most part I am defending that “top 20″ or so that can in fact develop pro players. Look at some of the top programs in the US, they are “pro-style” teams with sophisticated offenses (not just pounding it towards the tall foreign guy up top). Sure, there are some tactically retrograde programs floating around the top of college soccer (Akron, Kentucky, and Creighton immediately come to mind, though I might be out of date), but many of the top teams play an attacking, reasonably attractive variety of soccer.

I especially agree with the point the author makes regarding developing the sport in smaller and more alternative areas. Without the college programs currently in place, creating new fans of the sport, how many fewer soccer fans would there be in places like Albuquerque, Charlottesville, Omaha, Indiana and many others where pro teams are some distance away?

Of course, there are huge numbers of flaws with college soccer and they’ve been addressed a million times in a million places. That said, the best in college soccer is not nearly as bad as people make out. And, if you live in the right place, you might a great little game in front of a nice atmosphere. This weekend alone there are quite a few decent matches which, if students are in town at the respective schools, should be played in front of decent crowds.

This Friday alone, these include St. John’s at Indiana and Notre Dame playing Wake Forest (both in Bloomington) as well as Maryland hosting UCLA and Portland hosting Virginia. It would take a lot of fingers to count the number of good pros that have come out of just those schools.

My point is, if you happen to live near a decent program, go see a college match this season. You’ll be annoyed for sure (the subs, the clock, etc.), but you might just be entertained too.